I'm not sure the spy shop london Program Outcome Domain 1: Provide patient-centered care

I don't know, given that the SBC is a fairly 'open' denomination (the requirements are very broad for churches to be admitted into the convention, and even more so for individual pastors on church staffs), I don't think we should be so quick as some seem to rejoice here on shunning all contrary and negative talk. I think that with PD and Emergents you are attempting to say, "Just because some church down the road looks similar to something else, doesn't mean it's actually a bad church," but in that you therefore admit that a "bad church" does exist, at least theoretically. And if I can take the example of Emergent, I would say it's fairly clear that with McLaren's "A New Kind of Christianity" and Bell's "Love Wins" that the trendline there was into heresy. Perhaps no big name SBC pastor fell for their song, but I don't think we can claim that average Reverend Smith may not be enticed, and for that I am glad that we have people discussing the errors of both ancient and modern theological systems and methodologies.

You have been losing weight without trying

"The fundamentalists may indeed be wrong and pushing a dubious agenda, but the juvenile anti-Christian paranoia by many is absurd. Why not just go in for teaching every subject purely as dates and names and be done with it then?"

It's my understanding that serious doubts have recently been cast on the claims of Casimir force detection. It was realized by the people who made the claims (Lamoreaux, Capasso) that there were electrostatic effects that had not been taken into account.